I just started my second term on the DNC.  During the first four year term, the only way to find out what was going in with DNC politics and activities outside of what they sent the members in press releases was to stay in touch with other DNC members.  Blogs have changed that dramatically and have already made the party and candidates more transparent and responsive.

I have very little criticism of anything on this site - I read it as frequently as I can and appreciate seeing various people's views and opinions.  As a whole, the writers are very articulate, informed and accurate, including [BOR writer] Karl-Thomas with whom I'm about to take issue on two matters:  Texas DNC members' connection to the grassroots and the now famous DFA survey of Texas Convention Delegates.

I'll discuss the non-poll first.  To be accurate, a poll must be conducted by certain standards, almost none of which were followed in this poll.  First, the poll was sent by an organization that many recipients recognized as biased toward one of the candidates.  Second, the respondents were self-selecting rather than random, destroying any accurate reflection that might have been derived from the Delegates as a whole.

I am friends with the Dean supporters who conducted the survey and we have discussed the survey.  They insist - and I believe them - that they thought Dean might come in second among Texas Conventioneers when they sent it out.  But the "poll" actually means very little.

They did not publish these numbers with the results, but of the emails they sent out, 14% responded.  That is not a bad return, but there is no way to rationally determine the degree to which those respondents represent the whole.  It could mean, for instance that the other 86% did not like or know any of the candidates enough to vote for them - and Dean would obviously be the most well known of the candidates.

Regarding Texas DNC members and their connectedness to the "netroots" or grassroots:  Not all of the DNC members who represent Texas are very connected to the netroots of the Party - in fact a number of them have probably never heard the term or read a blog.

It disappoints me, though, when I see people - particularly those as well informed as Karl-Thomas - conclude that to disagree with a portion of one of the many constituencies that make up the Democratic Party means that Texas' DNC members are out of touch or non-responsive to their constituent's desires.

I am probably more connected to the netroots and young people in the party than any of the other members in Texas.  The DNC members chosen by the Black Caucus are probably more in touch with the members of that caucus than I am.  The results of a play-poll do not have any
bearing on who is in touch with what. I wanted to comment on those items and let everyone know that I have started a Yahoo Group with the purpose of maintaining a dialogue between Texas Democrats and their DNC members.  On the new Group, you will find contact information for DNC members, web links to the DNC chair candidates, and informal polls.

I look forward to continuing the discussion...

David Holmes
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Texasdnc/